Friday, April 26, 2024

Heroes and GOATS, Part 2: More Words About Buildings and Food (On Fire)


Disclaimer:

When we last left off, I was disingenuously pontificating (really, is there any other way to do it?) about heroes, heroism, and sandwiches, roughly in that order. 

And it only gets worse from here. But before it does, let me first provide you with a mini reward for your patience so far. Enjoy. (And even here, they can't avoid compiling a GOAT goat list.)

Anyway, the whole thing came about when I tried to shoehorn together two unrelated thoughts via a bad pun. Sadly, it's not the most desperate thing I've done.

Well, in for a penny, in for another penny, I say. So let's now look at the other side of the coin.


GOATS:

It's past time that I brought up the whole Greatest Of All Time concept, at least as it applies to albums. 

And - as usual - the internet is taking a questionable-to-begin-with concept and making it even worse.  Sound familiar? 

I'll limit my annoyance to Twitter for now and just say that whether it's a pathetic bachelor in his pajamas/ mom's basement/fifties, or a soul-less marketing bot, both seem intent on pushing fairly lame records as GOATs, or at least underappreciated masterpieces.

Narrator's voice: But man has been thrusting his musical preferences upon his fellow man from time immemorial, and in this first scenario (let's call it "Scenario 1") Jaybee plays the protagonist/victim:

It was early in 1987 and I was minding my business at work when this otherwise nice guy (we'd bonded over the '86 Mets) marched up to me, raving about this great song I just had to hear. (Pro Tip: If anyone ever approaches you wielding that phrase, do yourself a huge favor and fake a heart attack, because you can be pretty sure you don't have to hear it.) He'd come armed with a loaded cassette player and headphones, cornered me by my desk, and insisted I listen. To this, it turned out.

Not quite 30 years old, I was into what we'd now call alternative rock. You know, jangly guitars, Michael Stipe mumbling, that sort of thing, etc. This song was slow and stately. The quivering-with-emotion vocal demonstrated excellent enunciation (something I always look for in a song). The basic melody was okay, if a bit exhausting with all the jumping from one octave to another higher one. Music as mountain climbing. Overall, the song was insisting upon itself, while my taste ran to music that was, if anything, ashamed of itself.

The Red Lady just wasn't doing it for me.  I'm not saying it's a bad song. It just wasn't my jam, as the young people say. Perhaps you might like it. Maybe even love it. It might even be on your GOAT list. It just isn't on mine.

But there was my friend, staring at me, stunned by my meh reaction. He slinked away with his cassette player between his legs, shaking his head, wondering how this could possibly be, while I called out behind him "Hey, it's not you, it's me!"

Narrator's Voice: In this second scenario (which we will call "Scenario 2") Jaybee, having not really learned anything the first time around, is now the perpetrator:

It was the late 1990s, or so. I was in the backyard prepping the barbeque for my in-laws who were visiting. As usual, I had music on, and this time it was the then recently re-released, expanded CD version of what I consider the greatest album of all time: The Who Sell Out

My niece Sara, then in her late teens, came out to the backyard to bring me barbecue sauce or a fire extinguisher, I forget which. Serendipitously, at that very moment, "Relax" - possibly the most sublime song on the album - was playing. What a moment! The best song on the best album is playing, and since music is universal we were about to experience a major musical bonding across the generations, right?

Well, I peered at her through the smoke to focus on her reaction to the song. Nothing. Maybe a wave to the fireman, but that was it. That is, until later, when, while drying off, I overheard her giving her statement "... my uncle was listening to some corny-ass music when he caught on fire".

Now, after spending these many years telling you about the music I love, I realize I'm just another guy armed with a cassette player, or in my case, a pack of hot dogs. And that your listening to my all time favorite album might only leave you perplexed / mystified. Here. Try it right now.

See what I mean? (Of course, I'm assuming you're not jumping around your house in/on ecstasy.)

Why meh? Music's universal, right? Well, I hate to tell you this, but no.

Let me repeat that: MUSIC IS NOT UNIVERSAL.

I know. You're thinking Wait just one second Jaybee! As brilliant as you are, you may have finally gone off the rails here. OF COURSE, Music Is Universal.

To which I say, no, music is barely local.

Let's take food as an example. Food is universal, right? We all have to eat, don't we? And we have figured out how to make it an enjoyable experience. But that doesn't mean we're all going to enjoy all of the same things (with the obvious exception of certain hot Italian sandwiches). 

Do we all like Indian and Japanese and Thai and Mexican and Spanish, etc.? Probably not. We each have our favorite types of food, but even within those types, there are some dishes we don't care for. 

So while the enjoyment of music is something that's universal. There are very few musical moments that are universal. Some songs. Maybe some albums? Bands? The only one I can think of is Sly and the Family Stone, circa 1969. And since then, we've let ourselves be split up into our different little market segments anyway, so that one barely counts. There are even Beatle-haters.

Outside of one's teens years - when our tastes are still forming - it's quite rare to hear something that profoundly changes your musical preferences. No matter how good a song may be, if it's outside our comfort zone, we're more likely to hear just the most basic formal elements (instrumentation, singing style, beat, etc.) of the genre rather than the specifics of that piece of music - and just enough of those for us to fit it into the stereotype we already have of that genre. At which point, we say "it all sounds the same". Of course it does, dummy!

My niece heard a band from the sixties singing a very sixties melody with very sixties chord changes, etc. Why would she like it? Back then she was listening to her version of the sixties, which, in her mind, is better than mine. And she is correct.

So you might ask Jaybee,what would it take for me to expand my horizons and become wise like you?

As I once told Pink Floyd before they were famous, "It takes Time."

Thursday, April 25, 2024

Heroes and GOATS, Part 1: Some Words About Buildings and Food

Caveat Emptor:

Too late! You've been had. I usually try for a clever (for me) title but now I'm just being downright misleading. What's more, the only thing these two concepts have in common is their overuse.

You were taken in because you remember the little item that used to/still(?) appears in the sports section of the Daily News after a "big game" like the Super Bowl, World Series, NBA Finals, Stanley Cup, Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show, etc.

Said item contained two drawings, side by side. One was of the "Hero" - the person who saved the game, and the other was the "Goat" - the one who lost it.

The one above comes from Game 1 of the 1986 World Series, with the Boston Red Sox pitcher Bruce Hurst, whose fine pitching muted the Met offense. On the right is New York Met shortstop Tim Teufel, whose error allowed the winning runs to score.

And it sure boils things down, doesn't it? No game analysis or "team effort" bullsh*t here. Just who saved the day, and, for those whose day was not saved, whose fault it all is. There's something very Catholic about it if you ask me. The Savior and the Sinner, sports edition.

But that was a day in a lifetime ago. I read the News back then, oh boy. New York sports teams occasionally made the grade and played in these games. Times have changed. 

I'll not let this prevent me from offering my almost worthwhile thoughts on these two concepts in their current incarnations. We can do Heroes, just for day one.


Heroes:

We heard a lot about "heroes" right after 9/11. And deservedly so, since many people were doing heroic things. Over time, though - like many accolades before it - the term got overused and misapplied. (Those music bloggers! They're the real heroes!)

One way you could tell that things were getting out of hand was when the term would get applied to an already famous person. How often have you seen newspaper articles or news clips about movie stars who fall ass-backward into some dicey situation only to then be thrust forward and portrayed as the hero of said situation? Print the legend, as they say. As a general rule, though, if they were famous, they were not heroes. I'd make the case (if I weren't so lazy) that actual heroism is in inverse proportion to fame.

In the aftermath of 9/11, the fictional character Jack Bauer from the show 24 was held up as a hero. Politicians who should have been doing their jobs would instead say how much we could use a Jack Bauer type to solve our problems. ("Mr. Mayor, we were discussing jaywalking..."). 

The Heroic spectrum/slippery slope/sliding scale whatever you wanna call it goes something like this: 
Speaks His Mind > Cuts Through Red Tape > Maverick > A Man of Action > Vigilante > Fascist
Yeah, it gets dark pretty fast.

Hence my weariness/wariness of the term.

Even when the person is a hero, we slap each other on the back and forget to figure out what made said heroism necessary in the first place. All too often such stories, when plumbed for the facts leading up to the heroic act, point to institutional failure. 

Much like those heartwarming stories of kids selling lemonade to cure cancer, once we hear about it, and our hearts are duly warmed we forget to ask what should be the obvious question: Why the hell is a KID trying to fix this problem?? The answer, of course, is: Because the adults have failed to.

By all means, buy the lemonade, but then vote out the congressperson who cuts cancer research. He/she isn't campaigning on that platform, per se. He/she is usually calling it "tax cuts".

The same goes for the grown-up hero. It's great what they do, but it's often something that wouldn't have needed doing if the rest of us addressed the problem in the first place. We shouldn't just thank him/her. We should f*cking apologize, too.

So, when I hear the word "hero" I have to suppress a shudder. And I'm supported by some famous (and occasionally fictitious) people:


I will now put in a good word for those heroes I can always and unreservedly applaud, knowing there's no political or institutional failure being covered up. They break down into two categories:

Hot:
  • Chicken (or eggplant, or shrimp, etc.) parmigiana has to rank way up there, right? And let's pause to appreciate the oxymoronic phrase "chicken hero".
  • Meatball
  • Do the roast beef sandwiches from John's Deli count?
Cold: 
  • Speaking of roast beef, my go-to has lettuce, tomato, mayo, salt, pepper (provolone optional)
  • A personal favorite: Red peppers, fresh mozz, prosciutto, sun-dried tomatoes, green cracked olives, basil, olive oil and balsamic vinegar

And. That's. About. It. Unless I've somehow convinced you to try goat parmigiana.

And tomorrow for something completely different.



Thursday, March 28, 2024

Children of the Danned

"They looked like cockroaches."
They looked like insects, with no vibe coming from them. Like librarians on acid.****** 
Kenny Vance


The Book of the Music:

Did you see the "movie of the book"? (I don't really care. Just work with me on this, okay?)

I didn't name either a movie or book but you are nonetheless aware of the phrase and its meaning, which is when they (yeah, those bastards again) make a (usually shitty) movie out of a (pretty good) book.

I want to talk about the "book of the music". 

What's that, you say?


Quantum Criminals, by Alex Pappademas and Joan LeMay (2023)

The music in question is by Steely Dan. The text* [Note to self: remember to trademark any/all other coin-able phrases identified here for future monetezation.] is by Alex Pappademas, and the drawings* * are by Joan LeMay.

Pappademas seems to know everything Steely Dan-related, musical or personal. He is painfully aware of this level of his obsession. Yet, it pays off. He is insightful, imaginative, and (very) funny. LeMay draws pictures, not only of the members of Steely Dan (itself a slippery concept) but also - crucially - of the characters in the songs***.

In fact, the book is structured around those characters, whose names emblazon the chapter**** headings. Some are based on real people. Some are real people. The rest are products of Becker and Fagen's twisted imaginations, all intersecting with the lives of Becker, Fagen, et al in some unlikely fashion. LeMay's drawings capture them in all their seedy glory and absurdity, thus adding even more humor and pathos to the occasion. (Actual photos would have ruined the bad vibes.)

Thus, making this one of the best "books of the music" I've ever read. If you're an SD fan be prepared to pull out your old albums to listen along as Pappademas gives his take on Hoops McCann and the El Supremo, the latter of whom I first thought was a person, I then read it on a can***** of the coffee we drink and thought it was that, and now I'm back to it being a person. So, it's an educational experience, too. 

A pretty great book of undeniably great music.

A


The Blog of the Music:

Speaking of which, since you didn't ask, here's my incomplete list of Steely Dan albums in order of preference: 

1. Katy Lied (1975) 

I don't know anyone who puts Katy Lied first, but there you are. It's got everything: great rock guitar, transcendent sax by Phil Woods on "Dr. Wu", sweet and sour singing by Donald Fagen, with occasional help from troublemaker Michael McDonald, dark/heartfelt/both lyrics. And a lot of beautiful music.  

Even a lightweight song like "Everyone's Gone to the Movies" serves to balance out the more soul-wrenching stuff, like "Any World I'm Welcome To". SD with their heart on their rolled-up sleeves, which is a ridiculous thing to say. What can I tell you? My very favorite albums get me to say ridiculous things.  

Great production, too. The book talks about this album as a great attempt at a sonic experience not  quite achieved. I can't imagine what that could have sounded like. 

A+


2-4. A tie between Can't Buy a Thrill (1972), Countdown to Ecstacy,(1973) and Pretzel Logic (1974). All different. All wonderful. 

Thrill is a great early seventies commercial rock album with excellent production. The songs still hold up. A
 
Ecstacy leans more into jazz (and guitar!) and as far as I'm concerned it beats all their later forays into that genre. A

Logic somehow balances all of these elements while keeping each song short and to the point. 


5-6. A tie between The Royal Scam (1976) and Aja (1977).

Scam, while quite good in terms of execution, is slightly lacking in all the other categories, making it less than compelling. Long on SD attitude, but a little short on SD magic. The only great moment is the guitar solo on "Kid Charlemagne". A-

Aja is their Pretender. a commercial breakthrough that's good but overrated, at least when compared to what they'd accomplished before. A-


7. Gaucho (1980)

Ah, Gaucho amigo! Lately, you've been touted on various internet sites as their real masterpiece. I'd like to attribute this phenomenon to how "art speaks differently to us over time". but it's really more about the internet's voracious appetite for content, which forces it to run the same music through a seemingly random-best-of-list-generater, and then leaving it to some poor schmuck to somehow justify the results. (How about Neil Young's masterpiece Everybody's Rockin'???)

I'll admit to loving "Time Out of Mind", "Third World Man", and to some extent "Gaucho", but    the rest sounds like a band SD might once have mocked. (The Little Feat phenomenon?) One       song can act as a meta-comment or parody. Three or four is a puzzling end-point in their                 misguided quest to sound "sophisticated" (whatever that word means anymore). 

They were fans of 1950s jazz but by the time they were of age only had 1970's jazz to work with. Bad fusion would have been a disaster, but Quiet Storm is just Easy Listening to me. SD               embalmed. And for all that, pretty good.

At least Aja had uniformly excellent solos and highlights like "Deacon Blues". It's a shame it        starts with the infernal electric piano that Donald insists on playing. Give me that good old            unplugged piano he played on albums 1-5.

          B+

As you can see, I'm into early Steely Dan, which they dismiss as "juvenilia". I'd politely tell them to f*ck off but they'd just smirk. Plus, Walter already did.

This all led me to their reunion album. (Everything Must Go is not on my to-do list, nor are their solo albums, except for Donald's wonderful Nightfly, which ranks alongside SD 1,2 and 3.

My first thought was that I wished Donald and Walter still loved rock 'n roll electric guitar as much as they seemed to love jazz electric piano. The jazzy-in-the-worst-way riff three minutes into "Gaslighting Annie" is not appreciated.

The good news is that the singing and playing here are quite good. I do, however, miss the days when you didn't have to wait for the lyrics kick in before liking it. The music would hook you for life and you'd have the rest of your life to get to the words, which here are pretty straightforward, anyway.

Fagen's singing is technically his most skillful. More emotionally remote but also more humorous, and Becker plays a nifty guitar throughout-ish.

It's not as immediately catchy as their best stuff. But at least they're trying here. And it's snappy, unlike Gaucho, which - even now - is still just getting up off its ass.

At the moment in Jaybeeland it has bested Gaucho - not its high points, but way better than its low ones - and is now fighting it out with Scam. I don't see it beating Aja let alone any of the first four albums.

Overall, I could have lived a full, happy life without it, but now that it's here in my house, I'm glad.

A-

"Cousin Dupree"


EXPLANATORY NOTES:

         * text of the book (TM)

       ** drawings of the book (TM)

     *** characters of the songs (TM) obviously

   **** drawings of the characters of the chapters of the book of the music (TM!!!)

 ***** can of the coffee (you can have this one for free)

******  Oh, yeah, that quote at the top is from the man who would become Jay 2.0 of Jay and the Americans, giving his first impression of our heroes when he first met them. Long story. But let's break it down into three parts and assess:

  1. Okay, fair.
  2. Unforgivable!
  3. All is forgiven.

Thursday, February 22, 2024

David and Neil's Excellent Adventures




                                                                                                                
"Live Music is Better" Bumper Stickers Should Be Issued!
    Neil Young, "Union Man"                                                                                                                
They might be better off I think the way it seems to me, making up their own shows, which might be better than TV.                                                                
    David Byrne, "Found a Job"                                                                                                    

It takes a lot for me to buy a live album. They're usually a waste. If they do familiar songs faithfully, who needs it? If they do them poorly who needs it? New songs are a plus but it's only rare instances when an entire album is made up of new songs (Running on Empty, Time Fades Away).

If you're lucky you'll run across a well-made live album by a band you're not into yet, so even though there exist studio versions of many of the songs, you haven't heard them, so it's like getting a brand new album that happens to be live. A defacto Time Fades Empty, which is what happened to me when I got the Fleetwood Mac record last year. (and Europe 72, Live Dead, Allmans at Fillmore, etc.)

But there are also those sloppy-as-shit live albums like The Song Remains the Same. And, no, I don't own it but the parts I heard sucked and I'm not gonna sit thru a twenty-six-minute "Dazed and Confused" unless Jake Holmes gets a royalty, and even then.... (Fully expecting Stupid-LZ-Fan-Hate-Mail now.)

And even worse are the ones with perfect renditions of studio cuts like The Eagles Live. They even do a perfect rendition of someone else's cover version of a song! Pathetic. It may be the point of a live show for some people (and to some extent I am one of those people), but a live album?? Never.

The Jaybee Gold Standard For Live Albums (or TJGSFLA, for short(er)) is one with exciting/improved versions of familiar songs - so that it all stands on its own as an album and the document of a live event. It's achieved more often on live jazz albums than rock/pop ones. On one hand, this makes perfect sense, since the jazz ethos is to create something new every time and they have the chops to do it. On the other, you'd think rock n' roll would give one more leeway to be sloppy, but it's surprising what a drag it is to hear your hero sing off-key. The original version of Live at Leeds, with its short tough rockers, and long power-chord-powered classics, works brilliantly. The expanded edition is even better overall, but Roger's better at shouting in this setting than singing the more melodic pop songs that are included.

So it took a long time for me to get these two live albums, which - oddly enough - were recorded around the same time, with Neil at his peak and Talking Heads approaching theirs.


But First, a Major Digression about a Major Digression (That is Still In Progress):

In 1978, I was getting tired of tracking down every last Little Feat album to ever-diminishing returns. I was ripe for something new when Talking Heads caught my attention. They had a cool name, their new  - their second - album had a very cool cover, and their single "Take Me to the River" got played on WNEW FM, the station that defined my horizons (and limitations, it would seem: I had no idea it was a cover of an Al Green song) for the 1970s. Punk seemed like a bridge too far but New Wave was definitely doable. 

I read various music magazines throughout the seventies: classic-rockish Hit Parader, usually, but sometimes the glitter-leaning Circus, which had naughty words (My dad found it and banned it from the house), and occasionally Creem, or even Crawdaddy, but never the Village Voice, which was just asking for trouble, a tabloid being hard to hide between the mattresses. (I can just see my dad picking it up thinking for maybe three seconds it was the Daily News, and then my then-short life flashing before my eyes...)

But I kept hearing about this guy Robert Christgau, who wrote for them who had the gall to NOT like Jackson Browne (actually it was worse than that. He found him boring). This made me very uncomfortable since I was a JB true-believer who nonetheless harbored secret nagging doubts about The Pretender, which is where all my friends jumped on the bandwagon, a little late alas. 

Eventually, my curiosity got the best of me and I bought a copy of The Voice and found a rave review for Talking Heads More Songs About Buildings and Food, by Christgau. His capsule review was - as I would learn - typically dense with ideas, but the phrase that stuck with me was "...so much beautiful (and funky) music...". How about that? I thought. Enthusiasm! (I'd come back for the ideas later.)

It was the push I needed, and hearing MSABAF was life-changing (if you consider music a big part of your life). The first listen was daunting. The first and last songs were fantastic, and each subsequent listen would shake loose another gem until I was a complete convert. (Yet, to this day I warn folks about David Byrne's vocals before giving my blessing.)

Like Little Feat, it wasn't their first album that was my first exposure. And that was a good thing, although I do think Talking Heads:77 is damn near as good as MSABAF, like how Little Feat was almost as good as Feets Don't Fail Me Now.

Fear of Music was a bit too much, though. Too much weird, not enough sweet. "Electric Guitar" and "Animals" were particularly annoying.

Remain in Light was a rebirth that I may only now be fully appreciating. 

This year is the 40th Anniversary of Stop Making Sense. Unless I can see it in a theater without a screaming baby, I'm not interested. When it came out, there was a screaming baby in the theater. Or at least I think it was in the theater. Maybe it was in the movie. (Interesting touch.)


Live and Let Live:

And as good as the movie was I had no desire to buy the accompanying live album. Especially since they had already put one out a couple of years before.

This one:








Talking Heads: The Name of this Band is Talking Heads Expanded (2004)

The earliest TH music, when they were a threesome, captured on video circa 1975 or so, is spare, tuneful, and a bit eerie. Imagine seeing David Byrne for the first time. Certainly interesting but maybe not built to last.

This set picks things up in 1977, after multi-instrumentalist Jerry Harrison (formerly with The Modern Lovers), has joined. His contributions both on guitar and keyboards add a crucial breadth to their sound. This is also the year their first album was released.

The original version of this record was 2 LPs and had 17 tracks. This expanded 2-CD edition has 33! It still covers the same 1977-81 time frame and includes about 75% of their catalog at that point. And the ommissions make sense.

With my vinyl versions of those albums gathering dust in the basement, and their old songs popping up in cover versions all over the place, I was, yes, nostalgic for what originally mesmerized me. So I caved and got this record. It is wonderful.

First, the band - especially the original foursome is tight, and Tina's bass is tuneful as hell. The later 10-piece incarnation is a little sloppier, and I'll admit SMS may have superior versions of the Remain in Light songs.

In those old videos, David Byrne/his character was tentative. But here, he leans into the weirdness and is a monster. (In a good way.)

The songs from Fear of Music (The Pretender of their albums) are an improvement. The music is, well, funkier and David Byrne sings his balls off. And quite a trick for someone who sounded like he had already done that.

So this is a far more comprehensive set than the single CD Stop Making Sense soundtrack. The only thing SMS has that TNOTBITH doesn't is a few songs from Speaking in Tongues. 

A-

"Love ---> Building On Fire"










Neil Young: Live Rust (1979)

This one is less successful than TNOTBITH because of the issues I cited above. Neil's singing is not always on the mark, which matters less as you get to the rock and roll part, but it's still an annoyance. 

Plus what I'd call "unnecessary" songs, like "Comes a Time" and "Lotta Love" which were just fine on the great Comes a Time, and the live versions of songs that were live to begin with just a few months prior on Rust Never Sleeps: "My My Hey Hey" (and vice versa), "Sedan Delivery", "Powderfinger".

I'm glad I have a live version of "Tonight's the Night", "I Am A Child" and "Sugar Mountain", but to be honest, none are superior to their prior versions.

Another issue is that a lot of these songs are staples of Classic Rock Radio so many are overplayed as it is. So it's not surprising that on my first play, I was meh. 

But the 2nd listen, when I was in the mood for Neil, (and Mrs Jaybee was in the mood for a murder show) I put on my headphones and settled in. Pretty soon Mrs. Jaybee is telling me to stop stomping my foot. It was getting in the way of the murders I think. Go Figure.

Which all goes to show how f*ckin' great these songs are. 

But I'm playing Talking Heads more.

B+

"Tonight's the Night"


Live and Let Die:

Christgau was right about something else, too: Running On Empty is better than The Pretender.

Thursday, January 25, 2024

The 13th Annual Jaybee-bies: 23 and Me

Alex G, Not Jesus C
Alex G, Not Jesus C

Executive Summary:

Music: Pop good.  Jazz and Blues great.

Music/Personal: Still striving for competence on guitar. 

Personal: I'm a grandfather now, and getting close to retirement.

Politics: Too many wars, dictators, climate deniers, and general assholery.


Abstract:

Pop in a holding pattern.

Jazz strikes back. 

The Blues never went away.

Oldies make a comeback. 

Fascists making a comeback, too, and way too many people are okay with it.

(Note: Shouldn't abstracts be longer than executive summaries??)


Humans:

Best:

The same group as last year but with one addition:

  • An ex-President - Jimmy Carter

Worst:

And the bar just keeps getting lower:

  • Jim Jordan
  • Tucker Carlson/Jesse Watters/Marc Levin/Laura Ingraham (what's plural for despicable?)
  • Elise Stefanik
  • An ex-President. You Know Who.
  • The Usual Suspects


Best Books:


Best Movies:    

  • Poor Things
  • Oppenheimer

I'm sure there were other good ones, but I don't get out much.


Best TV:

  • Ted Lasso
  • The White Lotus
  • The Bear
  • Baby J
  • Slow Horses
  • Reservation Dogs
  • Catastrophe

Suddenly I'm a couch potato.


Best Concerts:

None. I'm still waiting for one that's worth time/trouble/$.


Music Awards:

Most Work (But Worth it): 

Most Work (And Possibly Not Worth It): 

Educationally worth it, musically, not so much: all that time spent on Lou Reed, and specifically his first five solo records. Granted, it was wonderful to re-listen to the VU albums, and the good LR solo-ish records. But I was hearing those first five from scratch. And none of them cracked my top ten. Some way to spend the summer, huh?

Most Surprising (and Not Necessarily in a Good Way): 

But this year it is in a good way! (Lou Reed doesn't count, because I didn't have high hopes to begin with. Thank god for the Steely Dan book. I finally got to it after Christmas. I should have read it sooner. It reminded me of how they produced way more great music in the 1970s than Reed managed. They weren’t exactly summer breezes either but at least they had something to show for it.

Most Disappointing: 

The Dismemberment Plan: Emergency & I

Best Nostalgia:

Talking Heads: The Name of this Band Is Talking Heads - They really were a great band with great songs, just like I thought.

Best Artist: 

Miles Davis, due to sheer volume. 

I got ten (eight new) albums by him, and aside from Bag's Groove and Aghartha, I haven't gotten to the bottom of any of them yet.

The eight new ones came from two "Four Classic Album" collections. Here they are:

  • Cookin'
  • Steamin'
  • Workin'
  • Relaxin'
  • Miles Ahead
  • Sketches of Spain
  • Porgy and Bess
  • Elevator to the Gallows

I will get to this before I die.

Best Albums of My Year:

At first, I felt like I had to split genres this year because it seemed ridiculous to put Alex G ahead of Roots of Jazz Funk. But because I lean pop-centric, I'm enjoying Alex more right now. In a couple of years, though, who knows if that'll still be true? 

But goddamn it, my pop-democratic brain decided to mix them back up. The only true genre is Good, and that's subjective anyway.

  1. Alex G: God Save the Animals
  2. The Beths: Expert in a Dying Field
  3. Various Artists: Roots of Jazz Funk
  4. Galaxie 500: On Fire
  5. Duke Ellington Orchestra: At Newport
  6. Talk Talk: Spirit of Eden
  7. The Smile: A Light for Attracting Attention
  8. Miles Davis: Bag's Groove
  9. Fleetwood Mac: Live at the Boston Tea Party, Vol. 1.
  10. Thelonious Monk: Genius of Modern Music, Vol. 2

Honorable Mentions/Also-Rans/Tieds for Tenth: John Coltrane: Africa Brass, Forlorne: Daydream HangoverSun Ra: Lanquidity, Alvvays: Blue Rev

Oh, and Mrs. Jaybee's Favorites:

What can I say? She's way better at staying current than I am.

Best Compilations:

  1. Ella Fitzgerald
  2. Coasters
  3. Billie Holiday

Album I listened to the most but had the least to Say About (Due to Density – Mine, not the music's.)

Erik Satie: The Music of Satie


Some of the best songs - including some great jazz - I heard this year can be found here.


Conclusions:

A new granddaughter has pushed my musical concerns back to somewhat normal proportions. A positive development I think.

Pop was good but not great, a crucial difference. It does make me wonder if I'm all Popped out. Maybe I'm at that point where I get off the fence and stick to finding great older records and give up on current stuff. I've felt this way before and what typically happens is that someone puts out a pop album that completely dominates my imagination. I hope it happens. I'd like to avoid geezerdom if possible.

Jazz and blues filled the gap. The former via new records and the latter by dipping into ones I already had, more or less. (Sorry that BB and Sonny Boy count as 2022 records I just hadn't gotten to yet.)

Still nice to still have a democracy. But I'm worried.